Three
headlines
of the last week:
1. Two inmates commit suicide inside
Tihar jail.
Message: condition of inmates inside a
prestigious jail
2. Two students commit suicide in Hyderabad during the
protests against Telengana.
Message: anger against the making of a new state by central Govt.
3. An ex-constable of paramilitary
force trying to commit suicide in Delhi
arrested
Message: paramilitary soldier’s plight and
the quick police action
On the surface, these headlines conveyed
different messages, as conveyed by the media or understood by the public.
Is it really so?
Let’s look at
each of them closely.
First
one, the suicide inside the jail, doesn’t concern most of us, as it is about
those who have been punished by the law. They deserve it, we can say.
Does it matter
if a criminal lives or dies?
Even if the
crime is not fully proved, being inside the jail is sufficient to label a
person. We never distinguish between a
crime and the criminal. And we are not interested why the criminal did it?
Should we bother?
Is the criminal
a human being first? Does he need support to vent out his feelings? Of maybe
guilt, or loneliness inside the prison cell, or the anger against the system,
or the stress of what will happen to him in the future, and so on.
What if the
criminal gets a chance to reform? -To
lead a normal life… so that the crime rate will eventually go down…
Or maybe the
person, before doing the crime, has an emotional support system available so
that he or she can release the choked feelings, and perhaps think more
rationally…?
Second
news, of students’ suicide, connects immediately with the people divided
clearly between the favour and against of formation of a new state. How an
agitation can go to such extreme?
And the suicides
could not stop the Govt to pass the Telengana bill.
Amid all the
politics, nobody thought about the students who ended their lives openly.
Were those
students so stressed that they had no other option left?
Did they have
proper support system to vent out their choked feelings?
Did they really
want to die? Or was it their call for help?
Were they able
to share their suppressed feelings with somebody around?
What if they had
someone to unlock their anger and channelize their energy for a better tomorrow?
Third
headline, the suicide attempt by a paramilitary constable, got
chewed with a little amusement. A drama
played out in public place and quick response by usually inefficient policemen
saved a life.
Nobody asked why a depressed person was sent
to the prison.
Because, the law
is like that only. Trying to commit suicide is punishable under Indian Penal
Code.
The constable,
in news, had served in Border Security Force.
Are we
insensitive enough not to bother about a soldier?
Did he have sufficient
support to vent out his emotions?
What if he had
someone to share his agony and lead him to proper medical care if required?
Do our military
and paramilitary forces have a proper emotional support mechanism in place for
such a soldier?
To protect our
national borders can have at times a toll on the emotional health of the
soldier. Who is there for him in such a difficult times?
So,
Underneath, all the above three are about
the absence of a suitable support system for the stressed souls.
As
a human being, are we ready to provide such a care to anybody in need?